A study performed at the State University of New York at Buffalo
investigated the effects of intense exercise on the behavior of ADHD
children. Dr. Michael S. Wendt, Ed.D. designed and headed the six week
study
which yielded a significant improvement in the behaviors of ADHD children.
Greatest gains were made in reducing the incidence of conflict and
oppositional problems with subjects involved in the study. Children ranged
from five to twelve years in age and all were professionally diagnosed with
ADHD.
Wendt, who worked as a public school administrator said that the study was
conceived in his office while he worked as a vice-principal for an Upstate
New York School between 1992 and 1996. " I saw a correlation between
exercise and behavior, especially when it came to ADHD children. When
practice sessions were intense, at the beginning of an athletic season,
behavior problems of student-athletes did not occur as frequently as they
did when practices focused less on conditioning." Wendt, who has coached
basketball, track, wrestling and football in the past, was familiar with
the
training cycles (beginning with intensity and a focus on cardio-vascular
conditioning) of most school sports. " As vice principal, I used to enter
every student into a data-base when they entered my office. I also put in
the reason for their visit and it was soon evident that physical exercise
was having an impact on behavior."
Five years of work went into this study. "The first indication that I was
onto something surfaced when I compared the decrease in fitness and
activity
levels of children with the rising incidence of psychosomatic disorders
over
the past ten years. There was a direct inverse relationship. As our
American
children have become less physically fit, the incidence of these
psychosomatic disorders has increased proportionately," Wendt said.
Wendt also reviewed the contemporary research on how psychosomatic drugs
affected the neurological pathways to the brain. "Basically medication can
wake up the lazy areas of the brain. It was my feeling that children could
accomplish this same "Wake-up call" with exercise. There are obvious side
effects to medication but my main concern was that medications appear to
accomplish this " Wake up call" without increasing the body's blood-flow to
the brain. Research clearly states that blood flow is very important for
brain development and with intense exercise like running you get increased
blood flow to the brain. Research also indicates that by exercising, you
increase the production of neurotransmitters. Neurotransmitters are
important for adequate communication between nerve cells. Without efficient
communication between nerve cells behavior and learning can break down.
There is mounting research that outlines how exercise promotes the release
of Dopamine, epinephrine and other body chemicals that will have a positive
impact on learning.
Wendt's research showed a positive impact from intense exercise over a
period of six-weeks. Most behavioral changes were noticed around the
two-week mark. "I designed the exercise to have a 10 minute warm-up and 10
minute cool down with 20 minutes of exercise at 50-75% VO2 max. This
roughly
translates into a heart-rate zone of 135-175 beats per minute. The
frequency
of exercise was designed to be five out of seven days every week. Research
indicated that American children are not getting enough exercise in recess,
play or gym class. I designed this study to go beyond what we presently
expose kids to in normal settings and it paid off for the children, parents
and the study.
Wendt said, "One of our workouts during the week included a distance run.
We
extended the session and told children they could stop and rest whenever
they were tired, but they must keep their heart rate in the designated zone
of 135-175 beats per minute. Based on research, I determined this zone to
be
optimum for changing body chemistry, and as a result, produce a positive
impact on behavior. Surprisingly, we had many children run between two and
five miles during that session. That included five and six-year olds left
to
their own devices. It was incredible, especially when I had a colleague
recently tell me that kindergarten teachers would not let their children
take part in a walking exercise because it was too much for them. They were
asking the kindergarten children to only walk one lap around the track. "
The bottom line is that we are not challenging some of our most gifted
children. Their gift is the ability to handle a lot of activity. When they
get up to be active we remedy the situation by giving them a "Time-out."
If
they do not sit then we remedy the situation further by medicating them.
Giving them a "Time -in" may be the only remedy they need. The side effects
of increased exercise are well documented and the side effects of drugs are
well documented. Let common sense be the judge of what is best for our
children.
The implications of this research for education are huge. With the onset of
interest in brain based learning, brain chemistry will no-doubt become
increasingly important. As violence and behavior issues remain on the
forefront, this research will have the ability to make the difference in
both public and non public schools.
Questions can be
directed to mike_wendt@juno.com.
Here are some comments of parents who were enrolled in this program:
-My son was more laid back and was able to focus on an activity.
He also ate well.
-The program really made a change in my son's behavior. He was less
impulsive, more focused and able to concentrate.
-His behavior was all around better.
-He is not bouncing all over. He is more pleasant.
-He did not argue with me as much.
-He showed improvement in attention span, memory, self- confidence,
personal
management and awareness of his surroundings.
-Some days he was more manageable and much calmer.
-He seemed to argue with adults less and he seemed to be more kind.
-He became more focused and concentrated on what he needed to say.
-He seemed less aggressive and more focused.
-He seemed more focus and at ease playing,
Mike Wendt's Note: All of the respondents said that they would enroll their child in the
program again.
Parents indicated a change in behavior between weeks two and four of the
program.